2024 FFA U 2.0 Feedback Survey

How would you rate the overall value of this course in supporting your professional development and knowledge in fund finance?

Extremely valuable – exceeded my expectations

Valuable – met my expectations

Somewhat valuable – provided limited insights

Not valuable – did not meet my expectations

How did the round-table setup for case study sessions work for you? Did you feel your group had enough time to discuss and present solutions?

Very effective and well-paced

Somewhat effective format and pace

Not effective format or pace

Did the event feel well-paced, or was it too content-heavy for one day?

Well-paced – the content fit within the time allotted.

Slightly overwhelming – consider reducing the number of sessions

Too packed – it felt rushed, and I’d prefer a multi-day format.

Are there any sessions you felt were extremely valuable and should be repeated in future Universities? If so, please select up to two:

Advanced Issues in Subscription Facilities

Secondaries and NAV Loan Structures, Issues, and Underwriting

NAIC Update and Insurance Issues in Fund Finance

Technical Due Diligence of CFO Structures

The Private Equity Business Model

Key Factors and Trends in Fund Finance Credit Ratings

Structuring and Underwriting GP and Management Company Facilities

NAV Transaction Case Study

If any sessions were less productive for you, please select up to two that you’d consider omitting or condensing in the future:

Advanced Issues in Subscription Facilities

Secondaries and NAV Loan Structures, Issues, and Underwriting

NAIC Update and Insurance Issues in Fund Finance

Technical Due Diligence of CFO Structures

The Private Equity Business Model

Key Factors and Trends in Fund Finance Credit Ratings

Structuring and Underwriting GP and Management Company Facilities

NAV Transaction Case Study

Would you like to see additional topics in the future?

Yes

No – the current topics are sufficient